A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that would allow several new casino resorts become built through the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language into the ballot question that he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum includes a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For example, the concern mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing regional governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. Based on case filed within the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public money to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has taken up difficulties with the language into the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and religious teams have also noted the language used when telling paris Read More